Does everybody have one, yet?
Lately the term MP3 has become synonymous with all forms of easily transferable audio files. Devices that play these files are likely to dominate home and portable audio markets until an even more brilliant innovation takes over. But they are not yet as necessary to your home entertainment system as a DVD player, for example.
MP3 players provide an interesting array of services that prove invaluable to many but pretty useless to others. Younger users like them because it is an affordable and portable way to hear new music. The best MP3 players cater to adults because they offer a simple way to access many years of accumulated music. With up to 60 GB of space on the most ample player, music fans that complain about memory shortage are few.
But are they really helpful, or even necessary? Certainly everyone who has cultivated a collection of records or compact discs has a physical attachment to hard copies and creative album covers. One of the greatest disadvantages of the surge in MP3 players is the implied decay of the album as a unified work. Most consumers pack their players with scattered hits rather than entire albums, and completely disregard liner notes and cover art. Since cheap MP3 players can easily store dozens of albums, it's not probable that this argument will take hold.
Soon enough they will
Proponents of widely accessible and distributed digital music tout the benefits of democratically shared art. Fans are less subject to record companies and homogenous radio telling them what is hot; word of mouth and a thorough tour can now get a good band some well-deserved recognition.
If you are any kind of music fan and have a moderate ability with technology, you probably already have one. They are affordable, incredibly convenient, and still count as a fabulous status symbol.
More information on MP3 players